
A new discovery reveals how a mysterious quantum spin excitation — a solitary spinon — can exist alone, hinting at advances in quantum technologies.
Scientists from the Faculty of Physics at the University of Warsaw and the University of British Columbia have identified a way for a “lone spinon” to form within magnetic systems. This unusual quantum particle represents a single, unpaired spin and its existence offers new insights into how magnetism works on a fundamental level. The breakthrough, which could eventually support the advancement of quantum computing and new types of magnetic materials, was detailed in the journal Physical Review Letters.
Human knowledge of magnetism dates back to ancient times, beginning with the discovery of naturally magnetized magnetite. This early curiosity quickly led to practical tools. By the 11th century, Chinese inventors had developed the first compasses, which revolutionized navigation. Today, magnets are integral to countless modern devices, including data storage systems, loudspeakers, electric motors, and even medical imaging technologies. Curiously, they have also become a staple of travel memorabilia, often displayed proudly on refrigerators alongside photographs.
Magnets and quantum mechanics
Despite its widespread use, the nature of magnetism remained incompletely understood for a long time. The situation became further complicated when Niels Bohr and Hendrika Johanna van Leeuwen showed that magnetism could not be explained within the framework of classical physics. It was not until the development of quantum mechanics in the 1920s that it was understood that the magnetic properties of matter are primarily due to interactions between the spins of electrons. Spin, along with mass and electric charge, is one of the fundamental properties of elementary particles.
In 1931, Hans Bethe proposed a mathematically elegant solution to one of the fundamental quantum models of magnetism — the so-called one-dimensional Heisenberg model. Less than half a century later, in 1981, Ludwig Faddeev and Leon Takhtajan realized that the solutions to this model exhibited a surprising phenomenon: as if an indivisible electron “splits” into two more fundamental particles. The spin of the electron is 1/2 (in units of Planck’s constant ħ) and can be oriented in any direction in space. In the standard situation, an excitation involves the reversal of the spin of one electron, resulting in a change in the spin of the whole system by 1.
However, from Faddeev and Takhtajan’s theory, it follows that the fundamental excitations in a magnet change the total spin of the system by 1/2. These exotically behaving excitations were named spinons. Since then, many experiments have confirmed their existence. However, it was long believed that spinons could only form in pairs — and indeed, they had always been observed in this form — which made the phenomenon seem somewhat less “exotic.”
A lone spinon
In a paper just published in Physical Review Letters, a team of scientists from the Faculty of Physics at the University of Warsaw and the University of British Columbia has shown how such a singular excitation can be created as a single spinon. Such a spinon can be created in a very simple way: it is enough to add one extra spin to the ground state of the one-dimensional Heisenberg model (a theoretical description of a number of interacting spins).
The researchers also discovered that the same effect can be obtained if, instead of the ground state, a very simplified model of the so-called valence-bond solid (VBS) is used, in which the spins are paired in a very ordered way. A spinon in this model can be understood as a single unpaired spin that “travels” through a network of such paired spins.
Importantly, this theoretical prediction was recently successfully confirmed experimentally in the paper by C. Zhao et al. published in Nature Materials.
Spinons and their significance for future technologies
This is an important step towards a better understanding of the quantum properties of magnetics and could open the way to discovering new features of them. Of particular importance, spinons are the result of strong interactions between electrons and quantum phenomena such as quantum entanglement.
Similar mechanisms play a key role in phenomena as fundamental as high-temperature superconductivity or the fractional Hall effect in two-dimensional quantum liquids. Quantum entanglement is also the foundation of quantum computers and quantum computing as a whole.
“Our research not only deepens our knowledge of magnets, but can also have far-reaching consequences in other areas of physics and technology,” concludes Prof Krzysztof Wohlfeld of the Faculty of Physics at the University of Warsaw.
Reference: “Nature of Spinons in 1D Spin Chains” by Teresa Kulka, Miłosz Panfil, Mona Berciu and Krzysztof Wohlfeld, 13 June 2025, Physical Review Letters.
DOI: 10.1103/stvg-lg9h
The research was supported by the National Science Centre under projects 2016/22/E/ST3/00560 (K. W.), 2024/55/B/ST3/03144 (K. W.), 2018/31/B/ST3/03758 (T. K.), 2018/31/D/ST3/03588 (M. P.) and 2022/47/B/ST2/03334. (M. P. ), the University of Warsaw Excellence Initiative (M. P.), the Canada First Research Excellence Fund and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (M. B.), and supported in part by NSF grant PHY-2309135 to the Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics (KITP). The research was conducted with the support of the Interdisciplinary Centre for Mathematical and Computer Modelling at the University of Warsaw (ICM UW) under grant no. G73-29.
Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
Follow us on Google and Google News.
8 Comments
Quantum Breakthrough: Physicists Discover “Lonely” Spinon That Defies Magnetic Norms.
VERY GOOD!
Please ask researchers to think deeply:
If the norms you believe in can be defied, is the norms you believe in pseudoscience or is your observation and understanding incorrect?
Most people do not believe that these so-called peer-reviewed publications are systematically disseminating pseudoscience. However, defying empirical distinctions by defining the manifestly different θ and τ particles as identical. Two sets of artificially counter-rotating Co-60—whether symmetric or not—constitute mirror objects to each other. Perhaps only so-called peer-reviewed publications such as Nature, Science, and the Physical Review series would dare to act with such recklessness and shamelessness. The current state of physics and so-called top-tier or authoritative publications—with their visible and hidden corruptions and ugliness—has become truly shocking. Those peer-reviewed publications that mislead science and the public in the name of academia are even more despicable than ordinary publications.
If researchers believe the evidence, please browse https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/1925124100134790589 and https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/1927657274920383767 (If the link is not blocked).
From cosmic accretion disks to quantum spins, vortex structures permeate all realms. We demand that so-called peer-reviewed publications—especially those self-proclaimed academic journals like Nature, Science, and the Physical Review series—answer honestly and truthfully:
1. What is your purpose in incessantly propagating parity violation while ignoring the conservation of topological vortex parity, charge conjugation, and time-reversal symmetry?
2. Are the “God Particles,” “Devil Particles,” or “Angel Particles” you relentlessly propagate eternal?
3. If the “God Particles,” “Devil Particles,” or “Angel Particles” you ubiquitously advertise are not eternal, what endows them with decay and periodicity?
4. Do these “God Particles,” “Devil Particles,” or “Angel Particles” you ubiquitously advertise not require space and time to sustain their existence?
5. Is it commendable to persistently disseminate pseudoscience in the name of science?
Of particular importance, spinons are the result of strong interactions between electrons and quantum phenomena such as quantum entanglement.
Please ask researchers to think deeply:
1. Where does the strong interaction come from?
2. Does the strong interaction come from spin, or does spin come from strong interaction?
3. Does topological spin require strong interaction driving?
4. How do you understand the hierarchical structure of particles?
Hi Bao-Hua, I would like to explore the points you raised further. How can you be contacted?
This unusual quantum particle represents a single, unpaired spin and its existence offers new insights into how magnetism works on a fundamental level.
VERY GOOD!
Please ask researchers to think deeply:
How should we understand the formation and evolution of topological spin in spacetime?
I’m no expert in physics, so I can’t speak to veracity of the articles published incessantly on SciTechDaily, but I do notice they’re all over the place and they do contradict one another quite often.
Can’t imagine what a cringy, hair-ripping experience must it be for an actual physicist to read anything from this site.
Thank you for your comment.
True physicists not the actual physicist have long been brainwashed by so-called peer-reviewed publications. They have long been accustomed to foolishly appearing cool in public, like an ugly cat that is both dead and alive.