
Scientists examine the effectiveness of an antibody targeting cell adhesion molecule 1 in alleviating pain-induced neuronal activation.
Cell surface proteins are essential for facilitating cell communication and detecting changes in the extracellular environment. Their capacity to respond to external signals by modulating the internal biological activity of the host cell makes them valuable targets for therapeutic interventions.
One such protein, Cell Adhesion Molecule 1 (CADM1), is expressed across diverse cell types, including neurons, respiratory epithelial cells, endometrial epithelial cells, and mast cells. Recently, the antibody 3E1, which binds specifically to the extracellular domain of CADM1, has been identified as a promising tool for targeted drug delivery to cells expressing CADM1.
Given the high expression of CADM1 in peripheral nerves and distribution along neurites, a question that arose is whether the anti-CADM1 antibodies have an effect on the biological activities of nerves.
Investigating the Effects of Anti-CADM1 Antibodies
Professor Akihiko Ito and Dr. Fuka Takeuchi from the Department of Pathology at Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Japan, set out to seek answers to this critical question. They investigated the impact of anti-CADM1 antibodies on neuronal activity and their findings were recently published in the journal Life Sciences.
The team injected 3E1, the anti-CADM1 ectodomain antibody, under the mouse skin to study its localization on nerve fibers. Immunohistochemical and immunofluorescence studies revealed that the injected 3E1 was exclusively localized on peripheral nerves in the dermis.
The lead author of the study, Prof. Ito highlights, “As CADM1 can recruit neuronal receptors to the plasma membrane, we hypothesized that this accumulation of 3E1 may blunt neuronal sensitivity, i.e., have an analgesic effect, via altering the expression of CADM1 on nerve fibers. However, to our knowledge, there have been no studies that attempted to develop drugs in terms of inhibiting CADM1 in nerves.”

Analgesic effects were tested using a formalin-induced chemical-inflammatory pain test and video-recorded behavior analysis at 6-, 12-, and 24-hours post-injection. Mice injected with 3E1 exhibited less pain-related behaviors when compared with controls, with analgesic effects lasting up to 24 hours, which is significantly longer than the duration of 5 to 8 hours reported for the local anesthetic levobupivacaine.
Further investigations involved primary cultures of mouse dorsal root ganglion cells to study neuronal stimulation. Live cell imaging confirmed that 3E1 localized to the neurites, and protein analysis revealed that 3E1 formed a complex with CADM1 and decreased CADM1 expression. A femtosecond laser pulse was used to induce mechanical stimulation, with calcium fluorescence (Fluo-8) visualizing neuronal stimulation. The investigation revealed that neural transmission was markedly suppressed in 3E1-treated cells.
Notably, in this study no paralysis or behavioral abnormalities were observed in the treated mice, suggesting that 3E1 acts preferentially on sensory nerves rather than motor nerves.
3E1: A Safer Alternative in Pain Management
The effects of 3E1 stand out in the field of pain management, since a decade-long effort to develop effective antibody drugs for osteoarthritis and chronic pain has met with limited success. Despite the initial promise, antibodies like tanezumab, fasinumab, and fulranumab, which targeted the nerve growth factor (NGF), faced setbacks due to severe side effects like ischemia and tissue necrosis. Unlike these NGF inhibitors, 3E1 offers a new, and safer pain-relieving strategy with fewer drawbacks and more therapeutic potential.
Overall, the unique feature of antibody 3E1 to cluster CADM1 on the plasma membrane aids in its biological activity, and a single injection provides pain relief for a day or more, without motor paralysis or toxicity.
Expanding on the significance of their findings, Prof. Ito enthused, “The identification of an antibody that, when injected, spontaneously accumulates in nerves, bringing about an analgesic effect is likely to open up a new field of discovering ‘antibody anesthetics.’ We believe that the present study is unique and significant in that it presented adhesion molecules as new targets, and our attempts to humanize 3E1 and the resulting clones are expected to result in long-acting analgesics.”
Reference: “Relief of pain in mice by an antibody with high affinity for cell adhesion molecule 1 on nerves” by Fuka Takeuchi, Man Hagiyama, Azusa Yoneshige, Akihiro Wada, Takao Inoue, Yoichiroh Hosokawa and Akihiko Ito, 22 August 2024, Life Sciences.
DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2024.122997
Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
Follow us on Google and Google News.
7 Comments
This is a wonderful discovery, and i hope that it is further researched to utilize the life altering effects it could have on chronic pain syndromes! Good show to that team talking outside the box.! Optimistic about the future as someone with early onset osteoarthritis and chronic pain. Science is so beautiful
This science is not beautiful. It is cruelty to animals. A “formalin-induced chemical-inflammatory pain test” is not humane. “(I)n this study no paralysis or behavioral abnormalities were observed in the treated mice” means that untreated mice did suffer from paralysis and other signs of pain.
I am a medical anthropologist research, and left the field of medicine due to animal research and its inherent cruelty. I was trained as a biochemist and in medicine, where animal research is standard.
The scientists who conduct this type of research are psychopaths. You cannot trust their conclusions or their research, since you can’t trust people who are ethically capable of causing suffering to animals. Realize that these mice are used because, to these researchers, they are similar to humans. They can suffer and feel extreme pain. To support this research because it may reveal something that might help humans is supporting psychopaths.
There are people in pain who would be willing to try this. Use them. Use tissue culture. But stop torturing animals. And stop trusting animal abusers. These people need therapy, not more funding.
See my article, Animal Research – The Rot at the Core of Medicine. https://www.academia.edu/123055005/Animal_Research_The_Rot_at_the_Core_of_Medicine
This is the best method we have to test new therapies. Unless of course you are volunteering to take the place of the mice.
The “best” method is not one that causes suffering and is cruel. Psychopaths use an ends justifies the means argument to rationalize cruelty. Perhaps the scientists should experiment on themselves. That would solve the problem, since it would be on humans, making it relevant to human health, and it would be without causing suffering to others.
I’m sorry, testing on humans counts as causing less suffering than running the same tests on animals? You realize that’s objectively false, right?
I am excited by this discovery and eagerly await the opportunity to benefit from this science. Like millions of people in the world i too suffer from chronic back pain and Sciatica since suffering from a fall. I fear back surgery ans await the day i will no longer need meds and injections to alieviate pain.
Ischemia and tissue necrosis are not “side effects” of some antibodies used to stop pain, they are primary effects. They are the direct results of the antibodies’ behavior, not some tertiary knock-on effect that can be prevented.