Global warming is significantly increasing the likelihood of extreme temperatures affecting wheat production in key regions in the U.S. and China, according to a study by Tufts University. Heat waves once rare could now occur more frequently, with serious implications for global food supply if these major grain-producing regions simultaneously face crop failure.
A new study from the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University shows the likelihood of extreme weather in wheat-producing areas of the U.S. and China has increased significantly.
The world is getting hotter, causing shifts in seasonal patterns and increasing the amount of extreme weather such as severe droughts and heat waves, which can affect crop yields and food supplies. A recent study led by a researcher at the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University found that the likelihood of extreme temperatures that could affect crop yields has increased significantly in wheat-producing regions of the U.S. and China.
The findings predict heat waves that happened approximately once every hundred years in 1981 are now likely to happen once every six years in the Midwestern U.S. and once every 16 years in Northeastern China. The work shows the range of conditions that people need to prepare for, even if they haven’t occurred yet.
“The historical record is no longer a good representation of what we can expect for the future,” said Erin Coughlan de Perez, Dignitas Associate Professor at the Friedman School and lead author on the paper, which will be published today (June 2) in npj Climate and Atmospheric Science. “We live in a changed climate and people are underestimating current-day possibilities for extreme events.”
According to the most recent report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the average global surface temperature in the last decade was 1.1 degrees Celsius higher than it was between 1850 and 1900. To evaluate how this has changed our risk of extreme weather, Coughlan de Perez and her colleagues collected a large group of seasonal forecasts from the past 40 years. They used this ensemble to generate thousands of possible variations in temperature and rainfall, essentially showing all the things that could have happened in a given year. With this method, known as the Unprecedented Simulated Extreme Ensemble or UNSEEN approach, the researchers were able to estimate the likely frequency of extreme temperatures that exceed critical growth thresholds for wheat.
Winter wheat crops start their growth in the fall and are harvested the following summer. High temperatures in spring, when the plant is flowering, can affect the wheat’s development. At temperatures over 27.8 degrees Celsius (about 82 degrees Fahrenheit), the plants start to suffer from heat stress. At temperatures over 32.8 degrees Celsius (about 91 degrees Fahrenheit), important enzymes in the wheat start to break down.
“In the Midwest, we used to have seasons where you’d see an average of maybe four or five days of that enzyme breakdown threshold being exceeded—it was pretty uncommon,” said Coughlan de Perez, who is also part of the Feinstein International Center at the Friedman School. “But our research showed possible alternative realities of today’s climate that generated 15 days above this threshold, which we surmise would be very damaging.”
Record-breaking heat also tends to be associated with record-breaking drought, Coughlan de Perez said. The combination of these two hazards could severely impact the growing season. Both the U.S. and China are considered global breadbaskets—areas that produce significant amounts of the world’s grains. If these crops were to fail simultaneously, or at the same time as other staple crops, it could have serious impacts on the price and availability of food around the world.
The results indicate that both regions have been lucky in recent years. There is an aspect of randomness to weather—a range of possibilities could occur, sort of like when you roll a six-sided die. So far, these regions have been rolling fairly low numbers, ending up with cooler weather than they could have had. But climate change has switched out the die—the highest number is bigger than it used to be. These regions haven’t experienced the full extent of what is possible, and they might not be ready for it.
“My hope is that we can tell people that their die has changed. You can roll something really extreme,” Coughlan de Perez said. “Maybe you won’t roll an eight for a while, but I think it’s worth having some plans in place for when that happens.”
The researchers also identified regional and global atmospheric circulation patterns that could lead to severely hot and dry events, including a possible worst-case scenario where wheat production in both the U.S. and China is hit hard in the same season. Their results can help inform climate adaptation plans in these regions and ensure that stakeholders can prepare for the unprecedented events to come.
“I think, with climate change, we’re suffering from a failure of imagination. If we’re not imagining the kinds of extremes that could happen, then we won’t prepare for them,” Coughlan de Perez said. “We don’t have to be surprised. We can use tools at our disposal to try to understand what’s possible and be ready when it happens.”
Reference: “Potential for surprising heat and drought events in wheat-producing regions of USA and China” by Erin Coughlan de Perez, Hamsa Ganapathi, Gibbon I. T. Masukwedza, Timothy Griffin and Timo Kelder, 2 June 2023, npj Climate and Atmospheric Science.
DOI: 10.1038/s41612-023-00361-y
Research reported in this article was supported by NASA cooperative grant Today’s Risk of Extreme Events under award 80NSSC22K1706. Complete information on authors, funders, and conflicts of interest is available in the published paper.
The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funders.
“Record-breaking heat also tends to be associated with record-breaking drought, …”
The US Climate Reference Network (USCRN) does not show warming. Rather, it suggests cooling. There has been no statistically significant global warming for over 8 years. Furthermore, analysis I have done shows no evidence of increasing heat waves, which were at their worst in the 1930s.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/09/06/the-gestalt-of-heat-waves/
“[they] collected a large group of seasonal forecasts from the past 40 years. They used this ensemble to generate thousands of possible variations in temperature and rainfall, essentially showing all the things that could have happened in a given year.”
The unstated assumption is that the seasonal forecasts were accurate and reliable. No evidence is presented to support that assumption. What actually happened is probably a better indicator of what might happen in the future.
“We live in a changed climate and people are underestimating current-day possibilities for extreme events.”
Where is the evidence to support that assertion? I’m more interested in probabilities than possibilities. As usual, the operative words are “may” and “could.”
“Both the U.S. and China are considered global breadbaskets—areas that produce significant amounts of the world’s grains. If these crops were to fail simultaneously, or at the same time as other staple crops, it could have serious impacts on the price and availability of food around the world.”
Or, from a situation like war — such as is happening in Ukraine at the moment, and probably more amenable to intervention than attempts to control the weather.