A study finds that renting a home can accelerate biological aging more significantly than unemployment, pointing to the substantial health implications of housing stability. This aging is linked to various factors, from financial struggles to environmental conditions, but is potentially reversible, highlighting the critical health stakes of housing policies. The researchers emphasize the transformative power of policy reforms, such as more renter protections, in mitigating these negative health impacts.
The influence of renting compared to full ownership is twice as significant as the difference between unemployment and employment. The effects can be reversed, highlighting the pivotal role of housing policies in health improvement.
The biological impact of renting, as opposed to owner occupancy, is nearly double that of being out of work vs having paid employment, the findings suggest.
Fortunately, these effects are reversible, emphasising the importance of housing policy in health improvement, say the researchers.
Housing Aspects and Health
Numerous aspects of housing are associated with physical and mental health, including cold, mold, crowding, injury hazards, stress, and stigma. But exactly how they might exert their effects isn’t entirely clear, say the researchers.
To explore this further, they drew on epigenetic information alongside social survey data and signs of biological ageing, captured through evidence of DNA methylation in blood samples.
Epigenetics describes how behaviors and environmental factors can cause changes that alter the way genes work, while DNA methylation is a chemical modification of DNA that can alter gene expression.
Study Methodology
They used data from the representative UK Household Longitudinal Study (UKHLS, usually referred to as Understanding Society) and survey responses from the British Household Panel Survey (BHPS), which also became part of Understanding Society.
They mined the information available in the UKHLS on material elements of housing: tenure; building type; government financial support available to renters; presence of central heating as a proxy for adequate warmth; location in an urban or rural area. Psychosocial elements were also included: housing costs; payment arrears; overcrowding; and moving expectations and preferences.
Additional health information was subsequently collected from the 1420 BHPS survey respondents, and blood samples taken for DNA methylation analysis. Information on historical housing circumstances was gleaned by pooling the responses from the past 10 years of the BHPS survey for each respondent.
When analysing all the data, the researchers accounted for potentially influential factors: sex, nationality; education level; socioeconomic status; diet; cumulative stress; financial hardship; urban environments; weight (BMI); and smoking. Because the pace of biological aging quickens in tandem with chronological aging, this was also factored in.
Key Findings
The analysis showed that living in a privately rented home was associated with faster biological aging. What’s more, the impact of renting in the private sector, as opposed to outright ownership (with no mortgage), was almost double that of being out of work rather than being employed. It was also 50% greater than having been a former smoker as opposed to never having smoked.
When historical housing circumstances were added to the mix, repeated housing arrears, and exposure to pollution/environmental problems were also associated with faster biological aging.
Living in social housing, however, with its lower cost and greater security of tenure, was no different than outright ownership in terms of its association with biological aging once additional housing variables were included.
Study Limitations and Conclusions
This is an observational study, and as such, can’t establish cause. And the researchers acknowledge several limitations to their findings. For example, there were no contemporary measures of housing quality, and the DNA methylation data came only from White, European respondents.
But they conclude: “Our results suggest that challenging housing circumstances negatively affect health through faster biological aging. However, biological aging is reversible, highlighting the significant potential for housing policy changes to improve health.”
And they suggest that their findings are likely to be relevant to housing and health elsewhere, particularly to countries with similar housing policies.
“What it means to be a private renter is not set in stone but dependent on policy decisions, which to date have prioritized owners and investors over renters,” they add.
“Policies to reduce the stress and uncertainty associated with private renting, such as ending ‘no-fault’ (Section 21) evictions, limiting rent increases, and improving conditions (some of which have happened in parts of the UK since these data were collected) may go some way to reducing the negative impacts of private renting.”
Reference: “Are housing circumstances associated with faster epigenetic ageing?” by Amy Clair, Emma Baker and Meena Kumari, 10 October 2023, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.
DOI: 10.1136/jech-2023-220523
The study was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence in Healthy Housing and the Economic and Social Research Council.
Be the first to comment on "A Hidden Health Crisis: Renting’s Startling Impact on Human Biology"