Researchers discovered that restricting food intake to a 10-hour daily window enhanced important markers of heart health.
It is estimated that over one-third of adults in the United States have metabolic syndrome, a collection of medical conditions that increase the risk of heart disease, diabetes, and stroke. The syndrome is associated with several risk factors, including high blood sugar, elevated blood pressure, and increased cholesterol levels.
In a recent collaborative clinical trial entitled TIMET, researchers from University of California San Diego School of Medicine and the Salk Institute found that a form of intermittent fasting, called time-restricted eating, could improve the health of participants diagnosed with metabolic syndrome and have prediabetes.
Key Findings of the TIMET Study
The study, published online in the Sept. 30, 2024 edition of Annals of Internal Medicine, demonstrated significant improvements in key markers of cardiometabolic health, including blood sugar and cholesterol and lower levels of hemoglobin A1c, a marker of long-term blood sugar management.
“Metabolic syndrome, especially when paired with prediabetes, represents a critical tipping point in which the risk for developing type 2 diabetes and heart disease is greatly increased,” said Pam Taub, MD, co-corresponding author of the study and professor of medicine at UC San Diego School of Medicine. “We’re hopeful the findings of this study can help others who are looking to address their metabolic syndrome and reduce their risk for type 2 diabetes.”
The TIMET study is the first to evaluate the benefits of a customized time-restricted eating schedule in patients taking medication for metabolic syndrome.
In the trial, 108 adult patients of UC San Diego Health with metabolic syndrome were randomized into either a time-restricted eating group or a control group. Both groups continued to receive standard-of-care treatments and underwent nutritional counseling on the Mediterranean diet. All participants logged their meals using the myCircadianClock mobile app, developed at the Salk Institute, which was then reviewed by trial researchers.
For the time-restricted eating group, protocols were customized to each participant’s eating habits, sleep/wake schedules, and personal commitments. The resulting regimen had each person reduce their eating window to 10 hours per day, beginning at least one hour after waking up and ending at least three hours before going to sleep.
Results and Benefits of Time-Restricted Eating
After three months, patients who had completed the time-restricted eating regimen showed significant improvements in key indicators of heart health. The reduction was similar in scale to what is typically achieved through more intensive interventions by the National Diabetes Prevention Program.
“Our bodies actually process sugars and fats very differently depending on the time of day,” said Satchidananda Panda, PhD, co-corresponding author of the study and professor at the Salk Institute. “In time-restricted eating, we are re-engaging the body’s natural wisdom and harnessing its daily circadian rhythms to restore metabolism and improve health.”
Circadian rhythms are the 24-hour cycles of biological processes that affect nearly every cell in the body. Erratic eating patterns can disrupt this system and induce symptoms of metabolic syndrome, including increased abdominal fat and abnormal cholesterol or triglycerides.
According to Panda, time-restricted eating (eating all calories within a consistent 10-hour window) allows individuals to eat in a manner that supports their circadian rhythms and their health.
Time-restricted eating was also associated with decreased body weight, body mass index (BMI), and abdominal trunk fat, a type of fat closely linked to metabolic disease. Importantly, participants did not experience any significant loss of lean muscle mass, which is often a concern with weight loss.
Implications for Future Treatment
The TIMET trial adds to a growing body of evidence supporting the use of time-restricted eating as a practical, low-cost intervention to improve cardiometabolic health. The promising results suggest that healthcare providers could consider recommending this lifestyle intervention to patients with metabolic syndrome as a complement to existing treatments, though additional long-term studies are needed to determine whether time-restricted eating can sustain these benefits and ultimately reduce the risk of chronic disease.
“There is an urgent need for more effective treatment options that are accessible, affordable, and sustainable for the average American,” said Taub, cardiologist and director of the Step Family Foundation Cardiovascular Rehabilitation and Wellness Center at UC San Diego Health. “Our research demonstrates that lifestyle interventions, such as time-restricted eating, can have a meaningful impact on the trajectory of a person’s overall health.”
Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
Follow us on Google and Google News.
1 Comment
Mysteriously (to my doctor and I), seriously ill with chronic fatigue, generalized aches, pains and muscle weakness and serious mood swings at age thirty-seven in early 1981, in late 1981 I learned I had multiple very, very mild allergy reactions (e.g., Dr. Arthur F. Coca by 1935, “The Pulse Test,” 1956) to just about everything I regularly ingested. Experimenting at home on my own, I found the practically harmless typical single, single substance allergy reaction lasted only about six to twelve hours and began practicing partial avoidance and switching to a two larger meal a day with few snacks regimen and mostly (never completely) recovered in about a month.
In the summer of 2000 I learned from another adult male victim of the early 1980s his doctor somehow determined that added MSG (FDA approved for expanded use as an alleged “flavor enhancer” in 1980) was causal. I first wrote the FDA (with replies) of my early lay findings of connections between allergies, added MSG, chronic disease and obesity in October of 2005 (obviously, now, in-vain). Somehow, I don’t find it very reassuring that a highly trained medical team backed with huge government funding came up with the wrong solution in 2024. As common as my kind of food allergies are and as obvious as the added MSG connection was already to some in the early 1980s, the obvious solution to me is to permanently ban added MSG (minimally) from all commercially prepared pseudo-food products, not to ask half of adult America to put themselves on a rather strict dietary regimen.