Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    SciTechDaily
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth
    • Health
    • Physics
    • Science
    • Space
    • Technology
    Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest YouTube RSS
    SciTechDaily
    Home»Space»Astrophysicists Challenge the Cosmological Model
    Space

    Astrophysicists Challenge the Cosmological Model

    By Liverpool John Moores UniversityApril 3, 20142 Comments5 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Email Reddit
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram Email Reddit
    Astronomers Challenge Cosmological Model
    Time Line of the Universe. Credit: NASA/WMAP Science Team

    By comparing the predictions of state-of-the-art supercomputer simulations with the results of sophisticated statistical analyses of the cosmic background radiation, two independent studies are challenging the cosmological model.

    Astronomers Professor Chris Collins and Dr. Ian McCarthy from LJMU’s Astrophysics Research Institute are challenging the view that the currently preferred cosmological model of the Universe is correct.

    They are comparing recent measurements of the cosmic background radiation and galaxy clusters in two independent studies partly funded by the Science and Technology Facilities Council.

    One of the cornerstones of the Big Bang theory of the Universe is the cosmic background radiation (CBR). Discovered in 1965 these electro-magnetic waves bombard the Earth continuously from all directions at harmless microwave frequencies. However, the radiation arriving here has been cooled to only 2.7 degrees above absolute zero (as it traverses deep space) by the expansion of the universe; therefore, in the distant past the temperature would have been much higher. This leads us to the conclusion that the Universe had a hot origin – the so-called Big Bang – nearly 14 billion years ago.

    The Planck Surveyor satellite, launched in 2009 by the European Space Agency (ESA), is the latest in a line of several satellites designed to measure the temperature variations in the CBR from place to place across the sky. These tiny fluctuations slowly grow over time, eventually forming the stars and galaxies we see today. Because the radiation began its journey when the Universe was only 380,000 years old, these measurements provide vital information about the detailed composition of our Universe. The cosmic census provided by Planck is remarkably precise, giving us amongst other things accurate estimates of: the age of the Universe (13.82 billion years) and the amount of dark matter (31.7%) and dark energy (68.3%).

    It turns out that Planck is also sensitive to the largest gravitationally bound structures called clusters, which contain thousands of individual galaxies and large amounts of dark matter. Curiously, however, Planck has found fewer clusters than was predicted based on the CBR cosmological analysis.

    Now, in independent studies, the recent work of both Collins and McCarthy confirms the “Planck-cluster problem” in that there are much fewer massive clusters in the Universe than expected for the Planck best-fit cosmology, a result inviting a rethink of the underlying model.

    Professor Chris Collins explains: “We already knew that the number of clusters found by the satellite was lower than expected and we have now tested this by analyzing a new carefully constructed independent survey of some 1000 clusters over a large area of the sky using X-rays rather than microwave radiation. Our findings confirm that the number of clusters is about a factor of two below the prediction based on the Planck CBR analysis.”

    In a separate study, Dr. Ian McCarthy, his LJMU Ph.D. student Amandine Le Brun, and collaborators examined the detailed statistical properties of the CBR and arrived at the same conclusion.

    Dr McCarthy explains: “We’ve taken a completely different approach to previous studies, by comparing the predictions of state-of-the-art supercomputer simulations with the results of sophisticated statistical analyses of the CBR. The comparison itself is quite straightforward and avoids any potential issues having to do with identifying clusters and measuring their masses.”

    The discrepancy in the predicted and observed number of massive clusters strongly suggests that either the detailed budgeting of the standard cosmological model by Planck is not correct, or that the model itself is flawed in some way. In the latter case, one exciting possibility is that the deficit of galaxy clusters is pointing to an important contribution to the energy budget of the Universe by massive neutrinos, ghostly particles that interact with normal matter only very weakly. Particle physicists have long argued that neutrinos may have non-zero mass, but laboratory experiments have only managed to place relatively weak bounds on what the size of the mass is. McCarthy is planning to carry out large-scale simulations that include the effects of massive neutrinos on cluster formation.

    Collins’ work is carried out in collaboration with Professor Hans Bohringer and Dr Gayoung Chon from the Max Planck Institut fur Extraterrestrische Physik, Garching Germany, and is to be published in Astronomy and Astrophysics.

    McCarthy and Le Brun’s work is carried out in collaboration with Prof. Joop Schaye from Leiden Observatory Netherlands and Dr Gilbert Holder from McGill University Montreal Canada and is to be published in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

    References:

    “The extended ROSAT-ESO Flux Limited X-ray Galaxy Cluster Survey (REFLEX II) IV. X-ray Luminosity Function and First Constraints on Cosmological Parameters” by H. Böhringer, G. Chon and C.A. Collins, 10 October 2014, Astronomy & Astrophysics.
    DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201323155
    arXiv:1403.2927

    The thermal Sunyaev Zel’dovich effect power spectrum in light of Planck” by Ian G. McCarthy, Amandine M. C. Le Brun, Joop Schaye and Gilbert P. Holder, 17 April 2014, MNRAS.
    DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu543
    arXiv:1312.5341

    Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
    Follow us on Google and Google News.

    Astronomy Astrophysics Big Bang Cosmology Liverpool John Moores University Popular
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit

    Related Articles

    Is the Universe Lopsided? New Evidence Challenges Einstein’s Simplest Universe

    “Cannibal Stars” and Black Holes May Have Formed in the Universe’s First Second

    Scientists Discover the First Type of Molecule Formed in the Universe

    What Was The Universe Like Before The Big Bang?

    Scientists Provide a Theory on How the Universe Became Filled with Light

    Researchers Use New CMB Data to Analyze the First Hundred Thousand Years of Our Universe

    Scientists Use Quasars To Probe Dark Energy & Measure Its Role in the Evolution of the Universe

    12 Billion-Year Old Supernova Discovered by Astronomers

    The Bolshoi Simulation: Boxing the Universe

    2 Comments

    1. Madanagopal.V.C on April 6, 2014 9:38 am

      After the Big Bang explosion, it seems that only Dark Matter and Dark Energy have been racing in the expansion of the Universe, and the stars,galaxies and planets of the visible Universe is nothing but the trickle of this expansion. The initial energy of the big bang of the order of 10^19 Gev, is quite high and it accounts for the Cosmic Background Radiation, accounting for only 2.7 degree Kelvin now , suggesting a very high temperature in the initial stages. Most of the initial energy is exchanged for Dark Matter and Dark Energy in not a conspicuous visible form and only the trickle is found in the real visible Universe. Here you can account for the invisible neutrinos also which went invisible and hidden in the Universe.Thank You.

      Reply
    2. Sandhya on July 27, 2025 8:56 am

      Tururuur

      Reply
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • YouTube

    Don't Miss a Discovery

    Subscribe for the Latest in Science & Tech!

    Trending News

    Largest-Ever Study Finds Medicinal Cannabis Ineffective for Anxiety, Depression, PTSD

    250-Million-Year-Old Egg Solves One of Evolution’s Biggest Mysteries

    Living With Roommates Might Be Changing Your Gut Microbiome Without You Knowing

    Century-Old Cleaning Chemical Linked to 500% Increased Risk of Parkinson’s Disease

    What if Your Memories Never Happened? Physicists Take a New Look at the Boltzmann Brain Paradox

    One of the Universe’s Largest Stars May Be Getting Ready To Explode

    Scientists Discover Enzyme That Could Supercharge Ozempic-Like Weight Loss Drugs

    Popular Sweetener Linked to DNA Damage – “It’s Something You Should Not Be Eating”

    Follow SciTechDaily
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Pinterest
    • Newsletter
    • RSS
    SciTech News
    • Biology News
    • Chemistry News
    • Earth News
    • Health News
    • Physics News
    • Science News
    • Space News
    • Technology News
    Recent Posts
    • The Surprising Diet Rule That Makes “Good” Parasites Work
    • This Simple Blood Test Could Outperform “Bad Cholesterol” in Preventing Heart Disease
    • Scientists Uncover Potential Brain Risks of Popular Fish Oil Supplements
    • Scientists Prove There Are Just Six Degrees of Separation in a Social Network
    • Bee Bacteria Could Fix a Major Flaw in Plant-Based Milk
    Copyright © 1998 - 2026 SciTechDaily. All Rights Reserved.
    • Science News
    • About
    • Contact
    • Editorial Board
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.