The study found that the cognition ranking of participants decreased by 1-2% when just 8 minutes of vigorous activity was replaced by sedentary behavior.
Losing as little as 6-7 minutes per day to sedentary behavior or low-intensity activities has been linked to a decline in cognitive function, according to recent research.
The daily time spent in moderate and intense physical activity is linked to mid-life brain power, according to new research published in the Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.
The results indicate that the optimal level for working memory and mental tasks, such as planning and organization, is at this intensity level. Replacing it with just 6-7 minutes of light-intensity activities or sedentary behavior per day is linked to decreased cognitive performance.
Previously published studies link daily moderate and vigorous physical activity, or MVPA for short, to health, but few have included time spent asleep, which makes up the largest component of any 24-hour period, say the researchers.
They, therefore, adopted a compositional approach to find out if MVPA relative to all other daily movement behaviors might be best for mid-life cognitive performance.
They drew on participants in the 1970 British Cohort Study, comprising people born across England, Scotland, and Wales in 1970 whose health was tracked throughout childhood and adulthood.
In 2016–18, 8581 participants had reached the ages of 46-47, at which point they were asked to fill in detailed health, background, and lifestyle questionnaires, and to wear an activity tracker for up to 7 days and for at least 10 consecutive hours a day.
They took various cognitive tests for verbal memory (immediate and delayed word recall tasks) and executive function (verbal fluency and processing speed/accuracy). Scores for each test were summed to produce an overall global score for memory and executive function.
Among those who agreed to wear an activity tracker, 2959 participants were excluded due to device error, insufficient wear time, or failure to fully complete the questionnaires. The final analysis included 4481 participants, just over half of whom (52%) were women. Two-thirds (66%) were married and 43% were educated up to the age of 18. Over two-thirds (68%) were occasional or non-risky drinkers and half had never smoked.
Analysis of the activity tracker data showed that participants clocked up an average of 51 minutes of MVPA, 5 hours 42 minutes of light intensity physical activity, 9 hours 16 minutes of sedentary behaviors, and 8 hours 11 minutes of sleep over a 24-hour period.
Time spent in MVPA relative to other types of behavior was positively associated with cognitive performance after adjusting for educational attainment and workplace physical activity. But additional adjustments for health issues weakened these associations.
Sedentary behavior relative to sleep and light physical intensity activity was also positively associated with cognitive performance: a trend which likely reflects greater engagement in cognitively stimulating activities such as reading or working rather than any apparent benefit from watching TV, note the researchers.
The associations were stronger for executive function than they were for memory.
Compared with the average across the sample, participants in the upper half of cognitive performance scores spent more time in MVPA and sedentary behaviors and less time sleeping, while the lowest 25% of scorers clocked up the most light-intensity physical activity.
To better understand the joint associations of movement with cognition, the researchers reallocated time from one component to another, minute by minute, to estimate what impact this might have on global cognitive performance scores.
This revealed increases in scores after MVPA theoretically displaced other activities.
Individuals’ cognition showed a 1.31% improvement in cognition ranking compared to the sample average improvement after as little as 9 minutes of sedentary activities with more vigorous activities – a positive trend which became far more substantive with much greater reductions in sedentary activities.
Similarly, there was a 1.27% improvement from replacing gentle activities or 1.2% from replacing 7 minutes of sleep. Such improvements showed further improvement with greater exchanges of time.
Sedentary behavior was also favorable for cognition score, but only after substituting it for 37 minutes of light-intensity physical activity or 56 minutes of sleep.
Participants began theoretically declining in their cognition ranking within the study sample by 1-2% after just 8 minutes of more vigorous activity was replaced by sedentary activities. Ranking continued to decline with greater declines in MVPA.
Similarly, replacing vigorous activities with 6 minutes of light-intensity physical activity or 7 minutes of sleep, was linked with similar falls of 1-2% in cognition ranking, again worsening for greater losses of MVPA.
The activity trackers can only capture time spent in bed rather than sleep duration or quality, which might help to explain the association with sleep, say the researchers.
“MVPA is typically the smallest proportion of the day in real terms, and the most difficult intensity to acquire. Perhaps partly for this reason, loss of any MVPA time whatsoever appeared detrimental, even within this relatively active cohort,” they explain.
This is an observational study, and as such, can’t establish cause. And the researchers highlight various caveats: activity tracker measures can’t provide context for each component of movement. And despite a large sample size, people of color were underrepresented, limiting the generalisability of the findings.
Nevertheless, they conclude: “This robust method corroborates a critical role for MVPA in supporting cognition, and efforts should be made to bolster this component of daily movement.”
Reference: “Exploring the associations of daily movement behaviours and mid-life cognition: a compositional analysis of the 1970 British Cohort Study” by John J Mitchell, Joanna M Blodgett, Sebastien FM Chastin, Barbara J Jefferis, S Goya Wannamethee and Mark Hamer, 9 February 2023, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.
DOI: 10.1136/jech-2022-219829
The study was funded by the MRC & British Heart Foundation.
Non-coherent article. Starting to think these are written by diversity hires?
That is an assumption that displays your inherent biases, James. I’m sorry your life experience has been such that you came to associate diversity with language ability.
I’m sorry, but this is unreadable.
Please do revise the whole thing.