Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    SciTechDaily
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth
    • Health
    • Physics
    • Science
    • Space
    • Technology
    Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest YouTube RSS
    SciTechDaily
    Home»Physics»“Spooky Action” at Ultra-Short Distances: Unlocking the Quantum Core of Matter
    Physics

    “Spooky Action” at Ultra-Short Distances: Unlocking the Quantum Core of Matter

    By Brookhaven National LaboratoryDecember 5, 20244 Comments9 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Email Reddit
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram Email Reddit
    Electron Proton Collision
    Data from past proton-electron collisions provide strong evidence of entanglement among the proton’s sea of quarks (spheres) and gluons (squiggles), which may play an important role in their strong-force interactions. Credit: Valerie Lentz/Brookhaven National Laboratory

    Researchers at Brookhaven Lab discovered that quarks and gluons inside protons are entangled, reshaping the understanding of proton structure.

    Using quantum information science, they validated theoretical predictions with collision data, paving the way for studies at the Electron-Ion Collider.

    Peering Inside Protons With Quantum Science

    Scientists at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Brookhaven National Laboratory, along with their collaborators, have developed a novel method to explore the inner workings of protons. Using quantum information science, they analyze data from high-energy electron-proton collisions to map how particle tracks are shaped by quantum entanglement within the proton.

    Their findings reveal that quarks and gluons—the fundamental particles that form a proton’s structure—experience quantum entanglement. This phenomenon, famously dubbed “spooky action at a distance” by Albert Einstein, allows particles to share information about their states, such as spin direction, even when separated. However, in protons, this entanglement happens at astonishingly small scales—less than one quadrillionth of a meter—and extends across the entire group of quarks and gluons within the proton.

    Mapping the Impact of Entanglement

    The team’s latest paper, published on December 2 in the journal Reports on Progress in Physics (ROPP), summarizes the group’s six-year research effort. It maps out precisely how entanglement affects the distribution of stable particles that emerge at various angles from the particle smashups after quarks and gluons liberated in the collisions coalesce to form these new composite particles.

    This new view of entanglement among quarks and gluons adds a layer of complexity to an evolving picture of protons’ inner structure. It may also offer insight into other areas of science where entanglement plays a role.

    Electron Nucleus Collision
    Future experiments at the Electron-Ion Collider (EIC) will reveal how being in a nucleus affects the quantum entanglement among quarks and gluons within a proton. Credit: Tiffany Bowman/Brookhaven National Laboratory

    A Dynamic System of Proton Structure

    “Before we did this work, no one had looked at entanglement inside of a proton in experimental high-energy collision data,” said physicist Zhoudunming (Kong) Tu, a co-author on the paper and collaborator on this exploration since joining Brookhaven Lab in 2018. “For decades, we’ve had a traditional view of the proton as a collection of quarks and gluons and we’ve been focused on understanding so-called single-particle properties, including how quarks and gluons are distributed inside the proton.

    “Now, with evidence that quarks and gluons are entangled, this picture has changed. We have a much more complicated, dynamic system,” he said. “This latest paper refines our understanding of how entanglement impacts proton structure.”

    Mapping out the entanglement among quarks and gluons inside protons could offer insight into other complex questions in nuclear physics, including how being part of a larger nucleus affects proton properties. This will be one focus of future experiments at the Electron-Ion Collider (EIC), a nuclear physics research facility expected to open at Brookhaven Lab in the 2030s. The tools these scientists are developing will enable predictions for EIC experiments.

    Dmitri Kharzeev
    Theoretical physicist Dmitri Kharzeev, a joint appointee of Brookhaven National Laboratory and Stony Brook University, developed equations based on quantum information science to predict how entanglement among quarks and gluons would impact the entropy, or disorder, of particles emerging from electron-proton collisions. Credit: Kevin Coughlin/Brookhaven National Laboratory

    Understanding Entropy and Particle Collisions

    For this study, the scientists used the language and equations of quantum information science to predict how entanglement should impact particles streaming from electron-proton collisions. Such collisions are a common approach for probing proton structure, most recently at the Hadron-Electron Ring Accelerator (HERA) particle collider in Hamburg, Germany, from 1992 to 2007, and are planned for future EIC experiments.

    This approach, published in 2017, was developed by Dmitri Kharzeev, a theorist affiliated with both Brookhaven Lab and Stony Brook University who is a co-author on the paper, and Eugene Levin of Tel Aviv University. The equations predict that if the quarks and gluons are entangled, that can be revealed from the collision’s entropy, or disorder.

    “Think of a kid’s messy bedroom, with laundry and other things all over the place. In that disorganized room, the entropy is very high,” Tu said, contrasting it with the low-entropy situation of his extremely neat garage, where every tool is in its place.

    According to the calculations, protons with maximally entangled quarks and gluons — a high degree of “entanglement entropy” — should produce a lot of particles with a “messy” distribution — a high degree of entropy.

    “For a maximally entangled state of quarks and gluons, there is a simple relation that allows us to predict the entropy of particles produced in a high energy collision,” Kharzeev said. “In our paper, we tested this relation using experimental data.”

    Zhoudunming Tu
    Physicist Zhoudunming (Kong) Tu has been exploring the possibility of entanglement among a proton’s constituent quarks and gluons since joining Brookhaven National Laboratory as a Goldhaber Fellow in 2018. Credit: Kevin Coughlin/Brookhaven National Laboratory

    Testing Predictions With Data Analysis

    The scientists started by analyzing data from proton-proton collisions at Europe’s Large Hadron Collider, but they also wanted to look at the “cleaner” data produced by electron-proton collisions. Knowing it would be a while before the EIC turns on, Tu joined one of the HERA experiment collaborations, known as H1, which still has a crew of retired physicists meeting occasionally to discuss their experiment.

    Tu worked with physicist Stefan Schmitt, the current co-spokesperson for H1 from the Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY), for three years to mine the old data. The pair cataloged detailed information from data recorded in 2006-2007, including how particle production and distributions varied and a wide range of other information about the collisions that produced these distributions. They published all the data for others to use.

    When the physicists compared the HERA data with the entropy calculations, the results matched the predictions perfectly. These analyses, including the latest ROPP results on how particle distributions change at various angles from the collision point, provide strong evidence that quarks and gluons inside protons are maximally entangled.

    The results and methods help to lay the groundwork for future experiments at the EIC.

    Strong Force Interactions and Emergent Phenomena

    The revelation of entanglement among quarks and gluons sheds light on the nature of their strong-force interactions, Kharzeev noted. It may offer additional insight into what keeps quarks and gluons confined within protons, which is one of the central questions in nuclear physics that will be explored at the EIC.

    “Maximal entanglement inside the proton emerges as a consequence of strong interactions that produce a large number of quark-antiquark pairs and gluons,” he said.

    Strong-force interactions — the exchange of one or more gluons among quarks — take place between individual particles. That may sound just like the simplest description of entanglement, where two individual particles can know about one another no matter how far apart they are. But entanglement, which is really an exchange of information, is a system-wide interaction.

    “Entanglement doesn’t only happen between two particles but among all the particles,” Kharzeev said.

    Statistical Models in Complex Physics

    Now that scientists have a way of exploring this collective entanglement, the tools of quantum information science could make some problems in nuclear and particle physics easier to understand.

    “Particle collisions can be extremely complex with many steps that influence the outcome,” Tu said. “But this study shows that some outcomes, like the entropy of the particles emerging, are determined by the entanglement within the protons before they collide. Entropy doesn’t ‘care’ about the complexity of all the in-between steps. So maybe we can use this approach to explore other complex nuclear physics phenomena without worrying about the details of what happens along the way.”

    Thinking about the collective behavior of a whole system rather than individual particles is common in other areas of physics and even everyday life. For example, when you think about a pot of boiling water, you don’t really know about the vibrational motion of each individual water molecule. No single water molecule can burn you. It’s the statistical average of all the molecules vibrating — their collective combined behavior — that gives rise to the property of temperature and makes the water feel hot. In a similar way, understanding how one quark and gluon behave doesn’t immediately convey how a proton behaves as a whole.

    “The physics perspective changes when you have so many particles together,” Tu said, noting that quantum information science is a tool to describe the statistical or emergent behavior of the whole system. “This approach may offer insight into how the entanglement of the particles leads to the group behavior,” Tu said.

    Probing Proton Behavior in Nuclei

    Now that the scientists have confirmed and validated their model, they want to use it in new ways. For example, they want to learn how being in a nucleus affects the proton.

    “To answer this question, we need to collide electrons not just with individual protons but with nuclei — the ions of the EIC,” Tu said. “It will be very helpful to use the same tools to see the entanglement in a proton embedded in a nucleus — to learn how it is impacted by the nuclear environment.”

    Will putting a proton in the very busy nuclear environment surrounded by lots of other interacting protons and neutrons wash out the individual proton’s entanglement? Could this nuclear environment play a role in so-called quantum decoherence?

    “Looking at entanglement in the nuclear environment will definitely tell us more about this quantum behavior — how it stays coherent or becomes decoherent — and learn more about how it connects to the traditional nuclear and particle physics phenomena that we are trying to solve,” Tu said.

    “The impact of the nuclear environment on protons and neutrons is at the center of the EIC science,” said by Martin Hentschinski, a co-author on the paper from the Universidad de las Américas Puebla (UDLAP) in Mexico.

    Co-author Krzysztof Kutak of the Polish Academy of Sciences added, “There are many other phenomena we want to use this tool to study to push our understanding of the structure of visible matter to a new frontier.”

    Reference: “QCD evolution of entanglement entropy” by Martin Hentschinski, Dmitri E Kharzeev, Krzysztof Kutak and Zhoudunming Tu, 2 December 2024, Reports on Progress in Physics.
    DOI: 10.1088/1361-6633/ad910b

    This research was funded by the DOE Office of Science, the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program, UDLAP Apoyos VAC 2024, and Brookhaven Lab’s Laboratory Directed Research and Development program.

    Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
    Follow us on Google and Google News.

    Atomic Physics Brookhaven National Laboratory Nuclear Popular Protons Quantum Entanglement Quantum Information Science Quantum Mechanics
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit

    Related Articles

    A Fundamental Quantum Rule May Entangle the Entire Universe

    The Quantum Battery That Flipped Entanglement: A Stunning Reversal of the Rules

    Inside the Proton: The Most Intense Forces in the Universe, Revealed

    Magic Particles: The Large Hadron Collider’s Quantum Computing Breakthrough

    Revolutionary Calculations Unveil the Hidden Motion of Quarks Inside Protons

    Sequential “Melting” of Upsilons: New Insight Into the Hottest Matter on Earth

    Scientists Generate Matter Directly From Light – Physics Phenomena Predicted More Than 80 Years Ago

    Cracking the Secrets of an Emerging Branch of Physics: Exotic Properties to Power Real-World Applications

    Quantum Entanglement of 8 Photons Successfully Accomplished by Physicists

    4 Comments

    1. Bao-hua ZHANG on December 5, 2024 11:19 pm

      “The impact of the nuclear environment on protons and neutrons is at the center of the EIC science,” said by Martin Hentschinski, a co-author on the paper from the Universidad de las Américas Puebla (UDLAP) in Mexico.
      VERY GOOD!

      Please ask the researchers to think deeply:
      What is the spacetime background of the Nuclear Environment?

      Scientific research guided by correct theories can help people avoid detours, failures, and exaggeration. The physical phenomena observed by researchers in experiments are always appearances, never the natural essence of things. The natural essence of things needs to be extracted and sublimated based on mathematical theories via appearances , rather than being imagined arbitrarily.
      
      Everytime scientific revolution, the scientific research space brought by the new paradigm expands exponentially. Physics should not ignore the analyzable physical properties of topological vortices.
      (1) Traditional physics: based on mathematical formalism, experimental verification and arbitrary imagination.
      (2) Topological Vortex Theory (TVT): Although also based on mathematics (such as topology), it focuses more on non intuitive geometry and topological structures, challenging traditional physical intuition.

      Topological Vortex Theory (TVT) points out the limitations of the Standard Model in describing the large-scale structure of the universe, proposes the need to consider non-standard model components such as dark matter and dark energy, and suggests that topological vortex fields may be key to understanding these phenomena. Topological vortex theory (TVT) heralds innovative technologies such as topological electronics, topological smart batteries, topological quantum computing, etc., which may bring low-energy electronic components, almost inexhaustible currents, and revolutionary computing platforms, etc.
      
      Topology tells us that topological vortices and antivortices can form new spacetime structures via the synchronous effect of superposition, deflection, or twisting of them. Mathematics does not tell us that there must be God particles, ghost particles, fermions, or bosons present. When physics and mathematics diverge, arbitrary imagination will make physics no different from theology. Topological vortex research reflections on the philosophy and methodology of science help us understand the nature essence of science and the limitations of scientific methods. This not only has guiding significance for scientific research itself, but also has important implications for science education and popularization.

      All things follow certain laws, which can be revealed through observation and research ( such as topological structures ). Today, so-called academic publications (such as PRL, Nature, Science, etc.) obstinately believe that two sets of cobalt 60 rotating in opposite directions can become two mirror images of each other. This is a public humiliation to the normal intelligence of the public. They conducted extensive pseudo scientific research based on CP violations, published countless pseudo scientific papers, and received various awards. The so-called scientific evaluation system constructed based on these so-called academic publications opened the dirtiest, ugliest, and most evil era in the history of modern science. They hardly know what shame is.

      Please witness the exemplary collaboration between theoretical physicists and experimentalists (https://scitechdaily.com/microscope-spacecrafts-most-precise-test-of-key-component-of-the-theory-of-general-relativity/#comment-854286). It is normal to make mistakes in scientific research, but what is abnormal is to stubbornly adhere to erroneous positions and not repent.

      Let us continue to witness via facts the dirtiest and ugliest era in the history of sciences and humanities in human society. The laws of nature will not change due to misleading of certain so-called academic publications or endorsements from certain so-called scientific awards.

      As some comments have stated ( https://scitechdaily.com/super-photons-unveiled-sculpting-light-into-unbreakable-communication-networks/#comment-861546 ): Fortunately, we have enough pieces to put the puzzle together properly, and there are folks who have chosen to forego today’s societal structures in order to do exactly that.

      Additionally, some comments have stated ( https://scitechdaily.com/science-made-simple-what-is-nuclear-fission/#comment-862083 ): You have been spewing this type of nonsensical word salad for several years now. Outrage doesn’t equal competence. If anything, your inability to convince anyone is a sign of your incompetence. Ask the commenter:Today, so-called official (such as PRL, Nature, Science, etc.) in physics stubbornly believes that two sets of cobalt-60 rotating in opposite directions can become two sets of objects that mirror each other, and it even won awards. These so-called academic publications have the audacity to blatantly talk nonsense in public. Do you think this is personal misfortune or misfortune of humanity?

      Isn’t this the evil consequence of the Physics Review family misleading science? Academic circle is not Entertainment industry. Have some people really never know what shame is?

      Reply
      • Torbjörn Larsson on December 7, 2024 8:27 am

        What have any of your unscientific word salad and non-readable protestations to do with the nice theory and well tested predictions that the research letter did!?

        Reply
        • Bao-hua ZHANG on December 7, 2024 2:53 pm

          You are truly a devout believer and an outstanding student beloved by all. Nevertheless, regrettably, this precisely constitutes the evil consequence and tragedy of distorted education amid the rampant influence of pseudoscience.
          Enjoy your every day.

          Reply
    2. Torbjörn Larsson on December 7, 2024 8:21 am

      It’s a very neat paper, where dipole production is predicted at various angles (actually, pseudorapidities) and observed as number of partons (parton densities).

      Reply
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • YouTube

    Don't Miss a Discovery

    Subscribe for the Latest in Science & Tech!

    Trending News

    New “Nanozyme Hypothesis” Could Rewrite the Story of Life’s Origins

    Anatomy Isn’t Finished: The Human Body Still Holds Secrets

    “Pretty Close to Home”: The Hidden Earthquake Threat Beneath Seattle

    The Surprising Reason You Might Want To Sleep Without a Pillow

    Scientists Say This Natural Hormone Reverses Obesity by Targeting the Brain

    35-Million-Year-Old Mystery: Strange Arachnid Discovered Preserved in Amber

    Is AI Really Just a Tool? It Could Be Altering How You See Reality

    JWST Reveals a “Forbidden” Planet With a Baffling Composition

    Follow SciTechDaily
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Pinterest
    • Newsletter
    • RSS
    SciTech News
    • Biology News
    • Chemistry News
    • Earth News
    • Health News
    • Physics News
    • Science News
    • Space News
    • Technology News
    Recent Posts
    • Scientists Freeze a Spinning Nanoparticle to Its Quantum Limit
    • A 100x Faster Breakthrough Could Fix Quantum Computers’ Biggest Problem
    • New Memory Chip Survives 1300°F, Hotter Than Lava
    • Scientists Unveil Microscopy Breakthrough That Reveals “Invisible” Molecular States
    • Scientists Finally Crack the Mystery of Water’s Strangest Behavior After Decades of Research
    Copyright © 1998 - 2026 SciTechDaily. All Rights Reserved.
    • Science News
    • About
    • Contact
    • Editorial Board
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.